Ross v. First Savings Bank of Arlington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “it is appropriate for us to begin our resolution of the issue by reviewing the nature of the agreement between First Savings and Western”
• implying that participating banks did not have any interest in and to the contracts between the lead bank and the consumer
• implying that participating banks did not have any interest in and to the contracts between the lead bank and the consumer
• considering five factors to determine whether nonresident bank had sufficient minimum contacts with Iowa
• “[Activities of an agent within a state may support personal jurisdiction of a nonresident principal.”
• stating participation agreements “do not alone establish sufficient minimum contacts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).