Ross v. Day

Citations

• 232 U.S. 110
• 34 S. Ct. 233
• 58 L. Ed. 528
• 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1465

Syllabus

<p>Whether parties had actually improved Cherokee lands in such sense as to give them a preferential right of selection and allotment under § 11 of the act of July 1, 1902, c. 1375, 32 Stat. 716, is not a mere question of law but one of fact and law, and, as far as it involves the drawing of correct inferences from the evidence it is a question of fact.</p> <p>Where, in such a case, the whole controversy depends upon whether the allotment was in accord with actual ownership of the improvements thereon and there is neither fraud nor clear mistake of law in the decision of the Secretary of the Interior on final appeal to him, his findings are conclusive.</p>