Ross v. Clayton County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that [the plaintiff’s] constitutional due process rights were not violated . . . obviates the qualified immunity is- sue . . . .”
• “[A] property interest in rank is at least theoretically possible and a demotion could trigger procedural due process obligations even though the employee continues to work for the employer”
• describing warden’s authority as “unchecked”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).