Ross v. Clawson

Citations

• 47 Ill. 402

Syllabus

<p>1. Pleading—of the description of the makers of a note executed by partner's. Where a declaration upon a promissory note, in the introductory part thereof, described the defendants, Edward T. Eoss and George M. Hinckley, partners, doing business under the name of Boss & Hinckley, and then averred they made the note sued upon—that is, substantially, an averment, that the note was executed by them as partners.</p> <p>2, Pleading and evidence—of the admissibility of a note in evidence, as declared •upon. Where it is averred in a declaration upon a promissory note, the instrument declared upon was executed to “ Garrett Clawson,”—a note which is made payable to “ G. Clawson ” will support the averment.</p>