Ross v. Celtron International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “isolated incident of fraud” to deprive a single victim of property did not establish a pattern of racketeering activity
• finding that because the defendants’ alleged misrepresentations were made during the performance of the agreement, the plaintiffs could not proceed with a claim of common law fraud
• finding no “pattern” of racketeering activity where complaint alleged “‘an isolated incident of fraud”
• “[BJecause these alleged misstatements were made after the [contract] was executed and constitute promises to perform under that [contract], [p]laintiffs have only asserted a fraud in the performance claim.”
• no “pattern” of racketeering activity where complaint alleged “an isolated incident of fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).