Ross v. Briggs and Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no insurance coverage for claims alleging breach of contract because insurance policy provision excludes coverage for advertising injuries resulting from failure of protected person to do what is required by contract
• dermatologist did not infringe on competitor “Institute of Cosmetic Surgery and Hair Transplants” by advertising itself as “Institute of Cosmetic and Laser Surgery”
• dermatologist did not infringe on competitor \Institute of Cosmetic Surgery and Hair Transplants\ by advertising itself as \Institute of Cosmetic and Laser Surgery.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).