Ross Stores, Inc. v. Redken Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pre-suit discovery order is final and appealable when discovery proceeding was brought “against third parties against whom suits are not contemplated”
• noting that under predecessor rule to 202(b), order was final and appealable when “against third parties against whom suits are not contemplated . . . acting as mandatory injunctions against the discovery defendant”
• discussing the distinction between “pure” and “equitable” bills of discovery
• applying predecessor to Rule 202

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).