Ross Explorations, Inc. v. Freedom Energy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we will not address the merits of an argument where the appellant has failed to obtain a ruling from the trial court
• holding that we will not address the merits of an argument where the appellant has failed to obtain a ruling from the trial court
• noting that appropriate period for determining profitability depends “upon the facts of the particular case and the specific reasons production waned or ended,” and holding that, “[u]nder the facts of the instant case,” a 24-month period was reasonable for determining profitability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).