Ross Associates, Inc. v. Carlson Companies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining substantial competent evidence as 14 \'evidence which possesses both relevance and substance and which furnishes a substantial basis of fact from which the issues can reasonably be resolved'\
• the use of “may” in a statute connotes district court discretion
• use of the word may connotes the district court has discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).