· 4/17/1984
Rosos Litho Supply Corp. v. Hansen
Citations
- 462 N.E.2d 566
- 123 Ill. App. 3d 290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Moorman did not bar a plaintiffs negligence claim against an architect
- limiting Moorman to situations in which a product or good is involved where the UCC provides protection to plaintiff with its implied warranties
- economic loss occasioned by an architect's negligent performance of his professional duties is recoverable in an action in tort
- negligence suit allowed against architect because subject to malpractice action like any other professional
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.