Skip to main content
· 4/17/1984

Rosos Litho Supply Corp. v. Hansen

Citations

  • 462 N.E.2d 566
  • 123 Ill. App. 3d 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Moorman did not bar a plaintiffs negligence claim against an architect
  • limiting Moorman to situations in which a product or good is involved where the UCC provides protection to plaintiff with its implied warranties
  • economic loss occasioned by an architect's negligent performance of his professional duties is recoverable in an action in tort
  • negligence suit allowed against architect because subject to malpractice action like any other professional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.