Rosnick v. Dinsmore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that promissory estoppel claim has traditionally been used where to refuse promise unsupported by consideration would work injustice to party who relied to his detriment on promise
• notes that Nebraska Supreme Court has applied Restatement of the Law of Contracts (Second) § 90 (1981) in several cases
• “[T]here is no requirement of ‘definiteness’ in an action based upon promissory estoppel. . . . Promissory estoppel only requires that reliance be reasonable and foreseeable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).