Rosner v. Fader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing a variety of non-ownership property interests that have been held to fall within the purview of § 363(f)(4)
• reviewing cases and noting the absence of binding First Circuit precedent
• § 363(f) extinguished application of debtor’s unemployment insurance contribution rate to the purchaser as its successor under state tax law because it “is clearly intended to recover . . . sums that the Debtor would have paid had it remained in business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).