Rosier v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[a] party is permitted to indemnify itself, ‘against its own negligence[,] through a contractual provision negotiated at arm’s length with a willing indemnitor.’ When such an indemnification provision exists, it should be enforced”
• granting the defendant's motion to dismiss, finding that the existent express indemnification provision \must control the indemnity obligations\
• granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss, finding that the existent express indemnification provision “must control the 10 indemnity obligations”
• finding “unpersuasive” and unable to “find any authority” for the proposition that claims for contractual and equitable indemnity can co-exist
• dismissing plaintiffs' equitable indemnification claim because there was an express contract provision governing indemnification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).