Rosia Woodis v. Westark Community College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting in its discussion of Hoffman Estates that “vagueness challenges that do not involve the First Amendment must be examined in light of the specific facts of the case at hand and not with regard to the statute’s facial validity” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).