Skip to main content
· 8/29/2014

Roshchin v. State

Citations

  • 219 Md. App. 169
  • 100 A.3d 499
  • 2014 Md. App. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, as there was an arrest that plaintiff did not consent to, “the pertinent question before us is whether [defendant] possessed legal justification to arrest [plaintiff]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kehoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.