Rosewarn v. Washington Gold Mining Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disbarring lawyer who neglected clients’ matters, continued to practice law while his license was suspended, violated Rules governing IOLTA accounts, and failed to respond in to disciplinary authorities
• attorney’s failure to supply a client file to replacement counsel is a violation of Rule 1.16 (d)
• attorney who did not respond to the opposing party’s discovery, motion to compel, or motion for sanctions did not provide competent representation to the client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).