Skip to main content
· 3/26/1992

Rosevita Charter Construction Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 787 F. Supp. 39
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3698
  • 1992 WL 59070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A number of circuit courts of appeals have decided that, where a judicial forfeiture proceeding is pending, the claimant must litigate the claim for the return of the seized property in the forfeiture action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuste

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.