Rosenthal v. Michael Tauber & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was plain error for the court to fail to warn the jury about credibility problems with an accomplice’s testimony when the testimony was crucial, extremely unreliable, and comprised the sum total of the evidence against the defendant amounted to plain error
• reversing conviction because judge failed to caution jury against placing too much reliance on accomplice’s critical testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).