Rosensweig v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that while parties are entitled to a “fundamentally fair hearing” in arbitration, “arbitra tors are not required to follow all the niceties observed by the federal courts”
• finding \the arbitrators committed no misconduct because they had several reasonable bases for limiting evidence...\
• “[W]e inquire whether there was any reasonable basis for [the arbitrator’s] decision [to limit evidence].”
• the FAA “presumes that arbitration awards will be confirmed, and judicial review of an arbitration award is narrowly limited[ ]”
• “[A] federal court may vacate an arbitrator’s award only if the arbitrator’s refusal to hear pertinent and material evidence prejudices the rights of the parties to the arbitration proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).