Rosenstein v. Steele

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no deprivation of due process was SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0
• stating that this court will affirm an order of the district court if it reached the correct result for reasons that differ from our own
• “[T]his court will affirm the order of the district court if it reached the correct result, albeit for different reasons.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).