Rosenkrantz v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]n order which is reversed must be treated as though the order had never been rendered.” (citing, inter alia, S. Fla. Lumber & Supply Co. v. Read, 61 So. 125 (Fla. 1913))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alford v. Summerlin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-14· cited 21×
• TRW AUTOMOTIVE US LLC v. Papandopoles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-14· cited 5×
• Conlee Constr. Co. v. Commissioner
  U.S. Tax Court· 1970-03-03· cited 4×
• Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Diplomat Electric, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-04-08· cited 3×
• Perlow v. Berg-Perlow
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-22· cited 1×
• Tracey Mackey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-05· cited 1×
• State v. Pressley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-04-28· cited 1×
• Reese v. Baron
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-12-21· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• South Florida Lumber & Supply Co. v. Read
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1913-01-28· cited 16×
• Marshall & Spencer Co. v. Peoples Bank
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1924-08-02· cited 12×
• Rosenkrantz v. Hall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-03-03· cited 7×

Other cases named Rosenkrantz v. Hall

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Rosenkrantz v. Hall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-03-03· cited 7×