Rosenheim v. Hartsock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that repressed memories must satisfy a threshold reliability inquiry before being admitted at trial
• concluding that repressed memories must satisfy a threshold reliability inquiry before being admitted at trial
• explaining that when challenged, “testimony that relies on memories which previously have been partially or fully repressed must satisfy a pretrial reliability determination” which may require the trial court to hold a pretrial hearing on admissibility
• describing how victims retrieved memories of past abuse by submitting to over one hundred sessions of psychotherapy or institutionalization coupled with psychotherapy
• declining to adopt Daubert, but noting that state evidence code, caselaw from other jurisdictions, as well as Daubert, were helpful considerations in determining the admissibility of expert witness testimony
• declining to adopt Daubert, but noting that state evidence code, caselaw from other jurisdictions, as well as Daubert, were helpful considerations in determining the admissibility of expert witness testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).