Rosenbrock v. School District No. 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a “mandatory” construction of a constitutional requirement absent a “provision indicating that a failure to strictly observe” renders the action “void”
• “It has been repeatedly held by this Court that irregularities in the conducting of an election will not invalidate the action taken unless it appears that the result was, or may have been, affected thereby.”
• “It has been repeatedly held by this Court that irregularities in the conducting of an election will not invalidate the action taken unless it appears that the result was, or may have been, affected thereby.”
• summarizing numerous opinions that support this general principle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).