Rosenblum v. Thomson Reuters (Markets) LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting as -25- irrelevant the Commissioner’s discussion of the standards for disability under Social Security law; finding that the claimant’s failure to report his ongoing work activity was not a basis for relief under Rule 60(b)(6)
• “Thus, the defendant has established no more than that counsel failed to look for pertinent information already in the defendant’s possession during the evidentiary phase of these proceedings until after the judgment was entered in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).