Rosenblum v. Jacks or Better of America West Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \the difference in value between what [the victim] actually received and what he would have received had there been no fraud\
• “Employment of an attorney for a client in a lawsuit . . . implicitly authorizes the attorney to bind the client in matters of procedure.”
• “Employment of an attorney for a client in a lawsuit . . . implicitly authorizes the attorney to bind the client in matters of procedure.”
• “Employment of an attorney for a client in a lawsuit . . . implicitly authorizes the attorney to bind the client in matters of procedure.”
• “the difference in value between what [the victim] actually received and what he would have received had there been no fraud”
• “In Missouri, a victim of fraud has two options—he can return what he purchased and get his money back (recission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).