Skip to main content
· 9/30/1998

Rosenbloom v. Honour Corp.

Citations

  • 78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 686
  • 66 Cal. App. 4th 1477
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7569
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 10477
  • 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because shark bites are an occupational hazard of shark handling, under the primary assumption of risk doctrine “no duty is owed to protect the shark handler from the very danger that he or she was employed to confront”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sonenshine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.