Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2/26/2001

Rosenblit v. Zimmerman

Citations

766 A.2d 749
166 N.J. 391
2001 N.J. LEXIS 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that tort remedy for intentional spoliation was not novel but included under elements of tort of fraudulent concealment
holding that a patient has an actionable fraudulent concealment claim based on the physician's spoliation of evidence
holding that where the party seeking discovery ultimately receives it, a spoliation inference is not appropriate
finding that spoliation occurs in “situations where a party has altered, destroyed, or failed to produce evidence relevant to an issue in a case.”
recognizing intentional spoliation of evidence claim as form of fraudulent concealment
recognizing intentional spoliation of evidence claim as form of fraudulent concealment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Long

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.