Rosenblit v. Zimmerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that tort remedy for intentional spoliation was not novel but included under elements of tort of fraudulent concealment
• holding that a patient has an actionable fraudulent concealment claim based on the physician's spoliation of evidence
• holding that where the party seeking discovery ultimately receives it, a spoliation inference is not appropriate
• finding that spoliation occurs in “situations where a party has altered, destroyed, or failed to produce evidence relevant to an issue in a case.”
• recognizing intentional spoliation of evidence claim as form of fraudulent concealment
• recognizing intentional spoliation of evidence claim as form of fraudulent concealment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).