Skip to main content
· 7/14/1920

Rosenbledt v. Wodehouse

Citations

  • 25 Haw. 561
  • 1920 Haw. LEXIS 27

Syllabus

<p>Appeal and Error — law of the case — decision on reserved, questions.</p> <p>The rule generally referred to as the law of the case does not apply to interlocutory decisions and decisions on reserved questions so as to prevent this court from re-examining the same question when the case comes before it on a subsequent appeal.</p> <p>Deeds — construction.</p> <p>In case of a grant to “E, her lawfully begotten children, their heirs and assigns,” without such words as “after her decease” and E has no children at the time of the grant, the words “lawfully begotten children” become words of limitation and at common law E would take an estate tail.</p> <p>Same — same.</p> <p>But since estates tail cannot be created • or exist here E will be held to take an estate in fee simple unless in order to give effect to other provisions of the deed a different holding is necessary.</p> <p>Same — same.</p> <p>Where such deed contains an additional provision forbidding E from selling the land it will more nearly carry out the expressed intention of the grantor to hold that E took a life estate with remainder in fee to her lawfully begotten children.</p>

Judges: Coke, Edxngs, Kemp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.