Rosenblatt v. United Way of Greater Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The facts Rosenblatt seeks to add to his complaint now were available to him previously and he has not shown any reason, other than a misguided attempt at strategy, why he failed to plead them before.”
• “a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e) ‘must clearly establish either a manifest error of law or fact or must present newly discovered evidence’ and ‘cannot be used to raise arguments which could, and should, have been made before the judgment issued’”
• “a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e) ‘must clearly establish either a manifest 5 error of law or fact or must present newly discovered evidence’ and ‘cannot be used to raise arguments which could, and should, have been made before the judgment issued’”
• “a motion to alter or amend the judgment under 13 R. Doc. No. 67. 14 R. Doc. No. 68. 15 Moreover, McIntosh does not request relief that is recognized under another provision of the rules. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a) (providing grounds for a new trial). Rule 59(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).