Rosenblatt v. United Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “a legitimate interest in protecting [one’s] own private financial information”
• “[T]he opportunity to contest the previously complied-with subpoenas has passed, and the materials [the movant in the motion to quash] seeks to protect are already in the hands of respondent. Asking this Court now to re-bag the cat is asking the virtually impossible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).