Rosenberry v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defense of want or failure of consideration is an affirmative defense and the burden to show lack of consideration to support an instrument lies with the one seeking to avoid it
• “Under certain conditions parol evidence may be introduced to show the true consideration, or want of consideration for a promissory note or other instrument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frasier v. Carter
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-02-01· cited 37×
• W.L. Scott, Inc. v. Madras Aerotech, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-10-15· cited 31×
• Hall v. Hall
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-07-19· cited 28×
• Dennett v. Kuenzli
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1997-03-10· cited 17×
• Lewis v. Fletcher
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-09-09· cited 12×
• Center Bank v. Mid-Continent Meats, Inc.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1975-11-06· cited 11×
• Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Clark's Material Supply Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1966-04-13· cited 8×
• Isaak v. Idaho First National Bank
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1991-04-09· cited 5×
• Olpin v. Grove Finance Company
  Utah Supreme Court· 1974-04-30· cited 2×