Rosenberg v. Schwartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that “under CPLR 304 a ‘filing’ that commences an action requires a summons” and concluding that “[g]iven the absence of a summons, there was ‘a complete failure to file within the statute of limitations’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).