Rosenberg v. Raimondi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that absence from prior state was temporary during the time it was contemplated that the parent and child would return to the other state
• holding that absence from prior state was temporary during the time it was contemplated that the parent and child would return to the other state
• holding that absence from prior state was temporary during the time it was contemplated that the parent and child would return to the other state
• “[i]t is well- settled that the question of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, by any party, or by the court sua sponte
• suggestlng In dicta that a child's absence from his or her home state will no longer be considered temporary once the stay-at-home parent becomes aware of the other parent's Intent
• when mother Informed father that the children would not be returning to their \home state\ of New Jersey, father initiated proceedings In New Jersey within six months, thus preserving \home state\ jurisdiction In New Jersey

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).