Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant corporation’s visits to forum to purchase merchandise, “even if occurring at regular intervals, would not warrant the inference that the corporation was present within the jurisdiction of the [forum] State”
• finding that a clothing retailer in Tulsa, Oklahoma, who purchased a substantial portion of its merchandise from New York wholesalers to sell in its Tulsa store was not subject to jurisdiction in New York
• finding no jurisdiction where defendant’s contacts with state consisted of periodic purchases of large quantities of its retail stock from firms in the forum state and regular business trips to the forum state in connection to those purchases
• the corporation's contacts with the forum \would not warrant the inference that the corporation was present within the jurisdiction of the State\
• “The order entered below, although in form an order to quash the summons, and not a dismissal of the suit, is a final judgment, and the case is properly here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).