· 5/1/1987
Rosenbaum v. Texas Energies, Inc.
Citations
- 736 P.2d 888
- 241 Kan. 295
- 96 Oil & Gas Rep. 259
- 1987 Kan. LEXIS 340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The rule that parol evidence is inadmissible to contradict or vary a written contract presupposes an action involving a valid existing obligation.”
- parol evidence may be “introduced in an action to show the nonexistence of a binding contract” but not “to contradict or vary a [provision in] a valid existing obligation”
- “It has been held that a mistake of law does not excuse a party to a contract, unless it be a mutual mistake of both parties thereto . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.