Skip to main content
· 5/1/1987

Rosenbaum v. Texas Energies, Inc.

Citations

  • 736 P.2d 888
  • 241 Kan. 295
  • 96 Oil & Gas Rep. 259
  • 1987 Kan. LEXIS 340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The rule that parol evidence is inadmissible to contradict or vary a written contract presupposes an action involving a valid existing obligation.”
  • parol evidence may be “introduced in an action to show the nonexistence of a binding contract” but not “to contradict or vary a [provision in] a valid existing obligation”
  • “It has been held that a mistake of law does not excuse a party to a contract, unless it be a mutual mistake of both parties thereto . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.