Rosenbaum v. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendant's Rule 60(a) motion on the ground that two provisions in the underlying order conflicted
• discussing how a change to an order is substantive rather than clerical when it “alters the effect of the original order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).