Skip to main content
· 3/26/1993

Rosen v. Transx Ltd.

Citations

  • 816 F. Supp. 1364
  • 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 890
  • 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2142
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3954
  • 1993 WL 94810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • classifying pretextual retaliatory discharge under the Minnesota Whistleblower Statute as premised upon “intentional retaliation”
  • classifying pretextual retaliatory discharge under the Minnesota Whistleblower Statute as premised upon \intentional retaliation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.