Rosen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the explicit language of the statute indicates that under certain circumstances, the prohibited fraud is subject to the continuing offense doctrine
• explaining application of statute of limitation to continuing, as contrasted with discrete, offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Connolly, Jr. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-29· cited 23×
• Young v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-05-30· cited 8×
• State v. Diaz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-13· cited 5×
• Clements v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-10· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Toussie v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1970-03-02· cited 806×
• United States v. Larry Dwight Jaynes and April Marie Jaynes
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-02-05· cited 75×
• Commonwealth v. Andrews
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-05· cited 35×
• State v. Webb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-04-09· cited 16×
• Maguire v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-29· cited 12×