Rosen v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because Pennsylvania's engineering and architecture licensing statutes both recognize that the professions overlap, but neither statute establishes a clear, mutually exclusive delineation between the professions, the statutes must be construed together
• concluding that because Pennsylvania’s engineering and architecture licensing statutes both recognize that the professions overlap, but neither statute establishes a clear, mutually exclusive delineation between the professions, the statutes must be construed together
• stating that the Pennsylvania architecture licensing board is not entitled to the usual deference given to an agency's construction of its statutes because the agency shares jurisdiction with the engineering board
• stating that the Pennsylvania architecture licensing board is not entitled to the usual deference given to an agency’s construction of its statutes because the agency shares jurisdiction with the engineering board
• stating that “[t]he practice of engineering . . . permits engineers to design buildings, and engage in construction planning and management. The fact that the practice of architecture encompasses the same activities does not diminish the sphere of the practice of engineering”
• discussing, inter alia, the practice of engineering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).