· 11/23/1983
Rosen v. A-H, Inc.
Citations
- 456 N.E.2d 477
- 17 Mass. App. Ct. 126
- 1983 Mass. App. LEXIS 1515
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing subordination clause and rejecting repugnant words “in favor of a construction which makes effectual the evident purpose of the entire instrument”
- “[s]ubordination agreements are ‘consistently’ construed to afford substantial ‘practical’ benefits to the debt or security interest given priority”
- subordination agreements “ ‘consistently’ construed to afford substantial ‘practical’ benefits to the debt or security interest given priority”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grant, Kaplan, Dreben
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.