Skip to main content
· 11/23/1983

Rosen v. A-H, Inc.

Citations

  • 456 N.E.2d 477
  • 17 Mass. App. Ct. 126
  • 1983 Mass. App. LEXIS 1515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing subordination clause and rejecting repugnant words “in favor of a construction which makes effectual the evident purpose of the entire instrument”
  • “[s]ubordination agreements are ‘consistently’ construed to afford substantial ‘practical’ benefits to the debt or security interest given priority”
  • subordination agreements “ ‘consistently’ construed to afford substantial ‘practical’ benefits to the debt or security interest given priority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Kaplan, Dreben

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.