Skip to main content
· 3/3/2006

Rosemary Higbee v. Sentry Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 440 F.3d 408
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5397
  • 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,295
  • 97 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 929
  • 2006 WL 508706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that plain error review is discretionary
  • recognizing that plain error review is discretionary
  • recognizing that plain error review is discretionary
  • “The Advisory Committee notes to the new Rule 51 make clear that we should be guided by the principles of plain error in the criminal context.”
  • “The Advisory Committee notes to the new Rule 51 make clear that we should be guided by the principles of plain error in the criminal context.”
  • plain error review of jury instructions under Rule 51(d)(2) is limited and discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.