Skip to main content
· 11/9/1983

Rosemarie Manning v. Ashland Oil Company

Citations

  • 721 F.2d 192
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that label constituted substantial change- in lacquer thinner because, although a significant cause of the accident, “the label did not alter the dangerousness of the lacquer thinner as a tar stain remover”
  • suit against manufacturer of precursor chemicals used in making foam insulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Neaher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.