Rosemarie Gandy v. Sullivan County, Tennessee, and William John McKamey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court was “not constrained by Penton” because the plaintiff’s comparator was a predecessor rather than a coworker
• presuming that there was “substantial similarity” between plaintiff and her immediate male predecessor’s job
• affirming that EPA plaintiff can collect damages for violations occurring within limitations period
• running limitations period from commencement of the action in federal court
• “Plainly Rule 61 teaches that the proceedings are not to be disturbed because of an error that prejudiced no one.”
• “The doctrine . . . may allow a court to impose liability on [a defendant] for acts committed outside the limitations period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).