Skip to main content
· 5/19/2004

Roselink Investors, L.L.C. v. Shenkman

Citations

  • 386 F. Supp. 2d 209
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6905
  • 2004 WL 875262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a “[l]oan was the product of a business decision” because it “was made in answer to the problem [the debtor] was having with raising cash needed to remain in satisfactory standing with [its creditor]” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mukasey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.