Roseburg Forest Products v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he inclusion of specific matters in a statute implies a legislative intent to exclude related matters not mentioned”
• applying same principle to an injured worker’s decision to refuse modified work at the site of a strike
• union employee denied benefits when he refused to cross picket line for reinstatement position

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).