· 12/15/1874
Roseborough v. Roseborough
Citations
- 62 Tenn. 314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[a]n injury in fact is the invasion of a legally protected interest that is ‘actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical’”
- stating that a “party invoking federal jurisdiction must” demonstrate Article III standing
- “At the pleading stage, therefore, a plaintiff must ‘allege sufficient facts to support a reasonable inference that [it] can satisfy the elements of standing.’” (quoting Animal Legal Def. Fund, 8 F.4th at 718
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Freeman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.