Skip to main content
· 12/15/1874

Roseborough v. Roseborough

Citations

  • 62 Tenn. 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[a]n injury in fact is the invasion of a legally protected interest that is ‘actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical’”
  • stating that a “party invoking federal jurisdiction must” demonstrate Article III standing
  • “At the pleading stage, therefore, a plaintiff must ‘allege sufficient facts to support a reasonable inference that [it] can satisfy the elements of standing.’” (quoting Animal Legal Def. Fund, 8 F.4th at 718

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.