Roseborough v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a facial constitutional challenge does not preserve an as-applied challenge
• holding that a facial constitutional challenge does not preserve an as-applied challenge
• holding that a facial constitutional challenge does not preserve an as-applied challenge
• “Because Roseborough was not validly under arrest for violation of Code § 18.2-266 when his breath was tested, the implied consent law did not apply and its provisions permitting the certifícate of analysis to be admitted into evidence were not triggered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).