Roseboro v. Gillespie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff could not prevail on retaliation claim if “even absent the retaliatory motivation, the plaintiff would have received the same punishment.”
• holding that plaintiff could not prevail on retaliation claim if “even absent the retaliatory motivation, the plaintiff would have received the same punishment”
• noting that prisoners do not have a “constitutional right to a prison grievance procedure or to have his grievances investigated”
• finding the plaintiff failed to provide any basis to believe that a defendant would retaliate for a grievance in which the defendant was not named
• plaintiff failed to provide basis to believe defendant would retaliate for a grievance in which he was unnamed and of which he was unaware
• plaintiff “failed to provide any basis to believe that [the defendant] retaliated for a grievance that she was not personally named in”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).