Rose v. Village of Peninsula

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the annual collection of funds amounting to more than 10% of a city's general revenue was \substantial\
• denying summary judgment on due process claim where 11.8 to 13.9 percent of the city's general fund came from the mayor's court
• discussing hypothetical mayor's court that collects only one $7 fine in one year and concluding \[t]he relative insubstantiality of the $7 fine\ compared to an annual general fund of $700,000 \does not conclusively establish the mayor's impartiality.\
• discussing hypothetical mayor’s court that collects only one $7 fine in one year and concluding “[t]he relative insub-stantiality of the $7 fine” compared to an annual general fund of $700,000 “does not conclusively establish the mayor’s impartiality.”
• annual collection of fines amounting to more than 10 percent of the city's general revenue fund was \substantial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).