Skip to main content

Rose v. State

Citations

  • 846 N.E.2d 363
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 712
  • 2006 WL 1118150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that doctor’s repeated testimony that he believed and was convinced by child victim’s allegations invaded province of the jury
  • “[i]ndeed, his testimony was not based on medical evidence but on his belief that A.G. was 7 telling the truth”
  • “[i]ndeed, his testimony was not based on medical evidence but on his belief that A.G. was telling the truth”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Baker, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.